Scopus - FEBS Letters: A text-mining perspective on the requirements for electronically annotated abstracts


					1 of 1

FEBS Letters
Volume 582, Issue 8, 9 April 2008, Pages 1178-1181

Cited By since 1996

This article has been cited 1 time in Scopus:

Ruffell, D.
Spotlight on...Gianni Cesareni
(2008) FEBS Letters

View details of this citation

Inform me when this document is cited in Scopus:

E-mail Alert

Find related documents


	In Scopus based on
		references Find Documents Sharing References: All References Select References authors Find Documents Sharing Authors: All Authors Select Authors keywords Find Documents Sharing Keywords: All Keywords Select Keywords


	On the Web based on
		title authors Find Documents Sharing Authors: All Authors Select Authors keywords Find Documents Sharing Keywords: All Keywords Select Keywords

More Options

DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2008.02.072
Document Type: Short Survey

View references (33)

A text-mining perspective on the requirements for electronically annotated abstracts

Leitner, F., Valencia, A.

Structural Computational Biology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain

Abstract

We propose that the combination of human expertise and automatic text-mining systems can be used to create a first generation of electronically annotated information (EAI) that can be added to journal abstracts and that is directly related to the information in the corresponding text. The first experiments have concentrated on the annotation of gene/protein names and those of organisms, as these are the best resolved problems. A second generation of systems could then attempt to address the problems of annotating protein interactions and protein/gene functions, a more difficult task for text-mining systems. EAI will permit easier categorization of this information, it will help in the evaluation of papers for their curation in databases, and it will be invaluable for maintaining the links between the information in databases and the facts described in text. Additionally, it will contribute to the efforts towards completing database information and creating collections of annotated text that can be used to train new generations of text-mining systems. The recent introduction of the first meta-server for the annotation of biological text, with the possibility of collecting annotations from available text-mining systems, adds credibility to the technical feasibility of this proposal. © 2008.

Author Keywords

Article annotation; Electronically annotated information; Information extraction; Journal annotation pipeline; Perspectives; Review; Text mining

References (33) view in table layout

Select: Page

van Mulligen, E., Diwersy, M., Schijvenaars, B., Weeber, M., van der Eijk, C., Jelier, R., Schuemie, M., (...), Mons, B.
Contextual annotation of web pages for interactive browsing.
(2004) Medinfo, 11 (Pt 1), pp. 94-98. Cited 3 times.

Valencia, A.
Search and retrieve. Large-scale data generation is becoming increasingly important in biological research. But how good are the tools to make sense of the data?
(2002) EMBO Reports, 3 (5), pp. 396-400. Cited 8 times.
doi: 10.1093/embo-reports/kvf104

Spasic, I., Ananiadou, S., McNaught, J., Kumar, A.
Text mining and ontologies in biomedicine: Making sense of raw text
(2005) Briefings in Bioinformatics, 6 (3), pp. 239-251. Cited 14 times.
doi: 10.1093/bib/6.3.239

Shatkay, H., Chen, N., Blostein, D.
Integrating image data into biomedical text categorization
(2006) Bioinformatics, 22 (14), pp. e446-e453. Cited 5 times.
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl235

Engels, R. and Bremdal, B. (2000) On-To-Knowledge deliverable D-5. CognIT.

Alex, B. et al. (2008) in: Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, pp. 556-567.

Erhardt, R.A.-A., Schneider, R., Blaschke, C.
Status of text-mining techniques applied to biomedical text
(2006) Drug Discovery Today, 11 (7-8), pp. 315-325. Cited 7 times.
doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2006.02.011

Krallinger, M., Erhardt, R.A.-A., Valencia, A.
Text-mining approaches in molecular biology and biomedicine
(2005) Drug Discovery Today, 10 (6), pp. 439-445. Cited 21 times.
doi: 10.1016/S1359-6446(05)03376-3

Zweigenbaum, P., Demner-fushman, D., Yu, H., Cohen, K.B.
Frontiers of biomedical text mining: Current progress
(2007) Briefings in Bioinformatics, 8 (5), pp. 358-375.
doi: 10.1093/bib/bbm045

10.

Blaschke, C., Hirschman, L., Valencia, A.
Information extraction in molecular biology.
(2002) Briefings in bioinformatics, 3 (2), pp. 154-165. Cited 48 times.

11.

Hirschman, L., Yeh, A., Blaschke, C., Valencia, A.
(2005) BMC Bioinform., 6 (SUPPL. 1), pp. S1.

12.

Krallinger, M., Morgan, A., Smith, L., Leitner, F., Tanabe, L., Wilbur, J., Hirschman, L., (...), Valencia, A.
(2008) Genome Biol. BioCreative II Suppl

13.

Morgan, A.A.
(2008) Genome Biol. BioCreative II Suppl.

14.

Smith, L.
(2008) Genome Biol. BioCreative II Suppl

15.

Blaschke, C., Leon, E.A., Krallinger, M., Valencia, A.
(2005) BMC Bioinform., 6 (SUPPL. 1), pp. S16. Cited 2 times.

16.

Krallinger, M., Leitner, F., Rodriguez-Penagos, C., Valencia, A.
(2008) Genome Biol. BioCreative II Suppl

17.

Jensen, L.J., Saric, J., Bork, P.
Literature mining for the biologist: From information retrieval to biological discovery
(2006) Nature Reviews Genetics, 7 (2), pp. 119-129. Cited 59 times.
doi: 10.1038/nrg1768

18.

Orchard, S., Salwinski, L., Kerrien, S., Montecchi-Palazzi, L., Oesterheld, M., Stümpflen, V., Ceol, A., (...), Hermjakob, H.
The minimum information required for reporting a molecular interaction experiment (MIMIx)
(2007) Nature Biotechnology, 25 (8), pp. 894-898. Cited 16 times.
doi: 10.1038/nbt1324

19.

Krauthammer, M., Nenadic, G.
Term identification in the biomedical literature
(2004) Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 37 (6), pp. 512-526. Cited 32 times.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2004.08.004

20.

Rebholz-Schuhmann, D., Kirsch, H., Couto, F.
Facts from text--is text mining ready to deliver?
(2005) PLoS biology., 3 (2), pp. e65. Cited 9 times.

21.

Jose, H., Vadivukarasi, T., Devakumar, J.
(2007) EURASIP J. Bioinform. Syst. Biol., p. 2007.

22.

Hersh, W.
Evaluation of biomedical text-mining systems: Lessons learned from information retrieval
(2005) Briefings in Bioinformatics, 6 (4), pp. 344-356. Cited 6 times.
doi: 10.1093/bib/6.4.344

23.

Kim, J.-D., Ohta, T., Tateisi, Y., Tsujii, J.
GENIA corpus - A semantically annotated corpus for bio-textmining
(2003) Bioinformatics, 19 (SUPPL. 1), pp. i180-i182. Cited 70 times.
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg1023

24.

Blaschke, C., Yeh, A., Camon, E., Colosimo, M., Apweiler, R., Hirschman, L., Valencia, A.
Do you do text?
(2005) Bioinformatics, 21 (23), pp. 4199-4200. Cited 5 times.
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti695

25.

Bourne, P.
(2005) PLoS Comput. Biol., 1, pp. 179-181. Cited 5 times.

26.

Gerstein, M., Seringhaus, M., Fields, S.
(2007) Nature

27.

Hahn, U., Wermter, J., Blasczyk, R., Horn, P.A.
(2007) Nature

28.

Seringhaus, M.R., Gerstein, M.B.
(2007) BMC Bioinform., 8, p. 17. Cited 2 times.

29.

Leitner, F.
(2008) Genome Biol. BioCreative II Suppl

30.

Salton, G., Buckley, C.
(1998) J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci., 41, pp. 288-297. Cited 306 times.

31.

Smith, J.B.
(1994) CRC

32.

Breiman, L.
Bagging predictors
(1996) Machine Learning, 24 (2), pp. 123-140. Cited 1979 times.

33.

Wilbur, J., Smith, L. and Tanabe, L. (2007) In: Proceedings of the Second BioCreative Challenge Evaluation Workshop, pp. 7-16.

FEBS Letters
Volume 582, Issue 8, 9 April 2008, Pages 1178-1181


					1 of 1